^

But where did all animals we got now come from if they all died in the flood

Pagliacci wrote:

^ But where did all animals we got now come from if they all died in the flood

Noah's ark silly, c'mon you knew that...

jkc8560 wrote:

Pagliacci wrote: ^ But where did all animals we got now come from if they all died in the flood Noah's ark silly, c'mon you knew that...

and how big was this arc....how many people worked on it.....tell me more

and you shouldn't name call

Lysholm wrote:

Secular science agrees that catastrophic floods have occured but the Bible has a different version about how and when.

WHAT??? Are you serious?? Secular scientists don't agree with the Bible??
BTW There is no such thing as secular science.

Pagliacci wrote:

^ But where did all animals we got now come from if they all died in the flood

Good question!
Going back to your previous question about not enough water..... you now agree that there is PLENTY enough water on this earth to flood the entire world, in the flood model?

Ok...where did all the animals come from? Well there was at least 2 of every kind of animal that were saved. All animals are descendants of those that survived the flood. Rapid speciation accounts for so the diversity between the different kinds. And if you have been watching the science channel, you will have noticed recent examples of rapid speciation...(Not slow and gradual over millions of years) See the evidence fits the flood model!!

Next question... You might ask if the ark was big enough to hold all the different kinds?

Longloadr wrote:

A catastrophic event (flood)

Longloadr wrote:

turtles

Isn't 47 Million YO in conflict with your creation theory.. I noticed one headline exclaimed "they were 47 million YO and still doing it" ???

jkc8560 wrote:

Isn't 47 Million YO in conflict with your creation theory.. I noticed one headline exclaimed "they were 47 million YO and still doing it" ???

JKC... why do you just blindly believe they are 47 million years old? Do you think they did radiometric dating on the turtles? Perhaps carbon dated them if any soft tissue remains? Or... diod they date the sediment the turtles were buried in?

Rapidly buried animals in waterborn sediment is a worldwide phenomenom and supports the creation model.

Longloadr wrote:

Lysholm wrote: Secular science agrees that catastrophic floods have occured but the Bible has a different version about how and when. WHAT??? Are you serious?? Secular scientists don't agree with the Bible?? BTW There is no such thing as secular science.

At least my biology teacher used to tell me about catastrophic floods but they happened millions of years ago rather than thousands and not the whole world at one time.

With "secular science" I mean scientists who don't take the Bible for granted. They may believe in God but they don't make any pre-emptive assumptions.

Lysholm wrote:

At least my biology teacher used to tell me about catastrophic floods but they happened millions of years ago rather than thousands and not the whole world at one time.

So various floods deposited marine fossils everywhere on earth including the mountains? We must not believe there was ever one flood that covered the entire earth? (My biology teacher taught me the same as yours)