Longloadr wrote:

There are thousands of scientists who say that the evidence leads to a creator / law giver.

The vast majority of biologists, and even of Christian biologists, supports the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution neither proves nor disproves the existence of a God.

Lysholm wrote:

Longloadr wrote: There are thousands of scientists who say that the evidence leads to a creator / law giver. The vast majority of biologists, and even of Christian biologists, supports the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution neither proves nor disproves the existence of a God.

Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong?
Fortunately science is about seeking the truth and not going with the flow.

Longloadr wrote:

Lysholm wrote: Longloadr wrote: There are thousands of scientists who say that the evidence leads to a creator / law giver. The vast majority of biologists, and even of Christian biologists, supports the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution neither proves nor disproves the existence of a God. Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong? Fortunately science is about seeking the truth and not going with the flow.

That wouldn't still help you in any way. That conclusion is irrelevant when it comes to validity of ToE.
Besides, majority seems to be right more often than seldom anyhow.

Longloadr wrote:

Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong? Fortunately science is about seeking the truth and not going with the flow.

Can we invite Galileo to that discussion?

Sophist wrote:

Longloadr wrote: Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong? Fortunately science is about seeking the truth and not going with the flow. Can we invite Galileo to that discussion?

Sure... An example of a guy who didn't go with the flow. It takes a live fish to go upstream

Sorsis wrote:

Longloadr wrote: Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong? Fortunately science is about seeking the truth and not going with the flow. That wouldn't still help you in any way. That conclusion is irrelevant when it comes to validity of ToE. Besides, majority seems to be right more often than seldom anyhow.

Truth is irrrelevant in ToE?? Perhaps..... but there are others who are mistaken, but do truly believe it.

Longloadr wrote:

Sorsis wrote: Longloadr wrote: Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong? Fortunately science is about seeking the truth and not going with the flow. That wouldn't still help you in any way. That conclusion is irrelevant when it comes to validity of ToE. Besides, majority seems to be right more often than seldom anyhow. Truth is irrrelevant in ToE?? Perhaps..... but there are others who are mistaken, but do truly believe it.

I sometimes wonder are you just acting stupid/trolling on purpose. Well anyhow that's not my problem.
I was referring to this very own line of yours

Longloadr wrote:

Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong?

Sorsis wrote:

Longloadr wrote: Sorsis wrote: Longloadr wrote: Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong? Fortunately science is about seeking the truth and not going with the flow. That wouldn't still help you in any way. That conclusion is irrelevant when it comes to validity of ToE. Besides, majority seems to be right more often than seldom anyhow. Truth is irrrelevant in ToE?? Perhaps..... but there are others who are mistaken, but do truly believe it. I sometimes wonder are you just acting stupid/trolling on purpose. Well anyhow that's not my problem. I was referring to this very own line of yours Longloadr wrote: Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong?

OH!!!!! haha.
Ok... So shall we discuss how often the majority opinion has been wrong when it comes to ToE?
Lets start with the 'evidence' presented at the Scopes trial, shall we?

Longloadr wrote:

@Pags ...Hypocritical? Why would you think that? Science is about following the evidence no matter where it leads....not where you want it to lead. There are thousands of scientists who say that the evidence leads to a creator / law giver.

Pagliacci wrote:

Because you go through the pretence of posting threads in the Science forum when you have absolutely no interest in the replies....you simply tolerate them.....you answer all your own questions via a creator....don't you think you are being dishonest by wasting peoples time here

you didn't answer the question

Longloadr wrote:

Sorsis wrote: Longloadr wrote: Sorsis wrote: Longloadr wrote: Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong? Fortunately science is about seeking the truth and not going with the flow. That wouldn't still help you in any way. That conclusion is irrelevant when it comes to validity of ToE. Besides, majority seems to be right more often than seldom anyhow. Truth is irrrelevant in ToE?? Perhaps..... but there are others who are mistaken, but do truly believe it. I sometimes wonder are you just acting stupid/trolling on purpose. Well anyhow that's not my problem. I was referring to this very own line of yours Longloadr wrote: Shall we discuss how often the majority has been wrong? OH!!!!! haha. Ok... So shall we discuss how often the majority opinion has been wrong when it comes to ToE? Lets start with the 'evidence' presented at the Scopes trial, shall we?

No matter what kind of induction you make about Scopes trial or any other such incident, you can't make conclusion about ToE based on it. As I said, your approach is logically without a basis thus irrelevant.