greyhound919 wrote:

Hey guys I just came up with a theory of my own. I think everything in the universe is actually comprised of chocolate pudding. I don't really have any science to back it up I just think it's true. Kidding aside, I think your "theory of one", for now, makes for interesting science fiction but that is it. This "theory of one" seems more philosophical than scientific and is an intriguing theory but nothing new in the realm of philosophy. Should science turn up any evidence supporting this theory I might be more inclined to give legitimate consideration.

just wait, they discover next that there is actually only one Higgs particle. It is just like all of you to scoff, I shall be vindicated!

jkc8560 wrote:

greyhound919 wrote: Hey guys I just came up with a theory of my own. I think everything in the universe is actually comprised of chocolate pudding. I don't really have any science to back it up I just think it's true. Kidding aside, I think your "theory of one", for now, makes for interesting science fiction but that is it. This "theory of one" seems more philosophical than scientific and is an intriguing theory but nothing new in the realm of philosophy. Should science turn up any evidence supporting this theory I might be more inclined to give legitimate consideration. just wait, they discover next that there is actually only one Higgs particle. It is just like all of you to scoff, I shall be vindicated!

Haha... I'll wait for your vindication but not for too long. I have dinner reservations.

jkc8560 wrote:

This is my own postulation, that everything, everywhere is comprised of only one and the same minute particle. This particle is simply moving about throughout the universe without regard to time. Please comment as to your thoughts on this, possible? absurd?

Elementary particles, according to current theory (not string theory), are minute by definition: they don't even have volume... And what do you mean movement without regard to time? There is no movement without time.

Frankly, your 'theory' lacks of few things: it doesn't explain why we observe multiple particles with different properties (spin, position, momentum, mass, baryon number, lepton number, etc.) that interact in various ways and move along the geodesics of the curved spacetime. These are some elementary questions that should be answered before your model can even be considered.

Aristostomias wrote:

jkc8560 wrote: This is my own postulation, that everything, everywhere is comprised of only one and the same minute particle. This particle is simply moving about throughout the universe without regard to time. Please comment as to your thoughts on this, possible? absurd? Elementary particles, according to current theory (not string theory), are minute by definition: they don't even have volume... And what do you mean movement without regard to time? There is no movement without time. Frankly, your 'theory' lacks of few things: it doesn't explain why we observe multiple particles with different properties (spin, position, momentum, mass, baryon number, lepton number, etc.) that interact in various ways and move along the geodesics of the curved spacetime. These are some elementary questions that should be answered before your model can even be considered.

I love this place... If I hang out here for very long, I'll become a freekin Genius.... Like you !!! HE-HE

jkc8560 wrote:

Aristostomias wrote: jkc8560 wrote: This is my own postulation, that everything, everywhere is comprised of only one and the same minute particle. This particle is simply moving about throughout the universe without regard to time. Please comment as to your thoughts on this, possible? absurd? Elementary particles, according to current theory (not string theory), are minute by definition: they don't even have volume... And what do you mean movement without regard to time? There is no movement without time. Frankly, your 'theory' lacks of few things: it doesn't explain why we observe multiple particles with different properties (spin, position, momentum, mass, baryon number, lepton number, etc.) that interact in various ways and move along the geodesics of the curved spacetime. These are some elementary questions that should be answered before your model can even be considered. I love this place... If I hang out here for very long, I'll become a freekin Genius.... Like you !!! HE-HE

Doubtful: I started out like this. My first post was about the derivation of the Schrödinger equation.

Aristostomias wrote:

jkc8560 wrote: Aristostomias wrote: jkc8560 wrote: This is my own postulation, that everything, everywhere is comprised of only one and the same minute particle. This particle is simply moving about throughout the universe without regard to time. Please comment as to your thoughts on this, possible? absurd? Elementary particles, according to current theory (not string theory), are minute by definition: they don't even have volume... And what do you mean movement without regard to time? There is no movement without time. Frankly, your 'theory' lacks of few things: it doesn't explain why we observe multiple particles with different properties (spin, position, momentum, mass, baryon number, lepton number, etc.) that interact in various ways and move along the geodesics of the curved spacetime. These are some elementary questions that should be answered before your model can even be considered. I love this place... If I hang out here for very long, I'll become a freekin Genius.... Like you !!! HE-HE Doubtful: I started out like this. My first post was about the derivation of the Schrödinger equation.

and your next one was signing the praises of being a toilet trader

jkc8560 wrote:

Aristostomias wrote: jkc8560 wrote: This is my own postulation, that everything, everywhere is comprised of only one and the same minute particle. This particle is simply moving about throughout the universe without regard to time. Please comment as to your thoughts on this, possible? absurd? Elementary particles, according to current theory (not string theory), are minute by definition: they don't even have volume... And what do you mean movement without regard to time? There is no movement without time. Frankly, your 'theory' lacks of few things: it doesn't explain why we observe multiple particles with different properties (spin, position, momentum, mass, baryon number, lepton number, etc.) that interact in various ways and move along the geodesics of the curved spacetime. These are some elementary questions that should be answered before your model can even be considered. I love this place... If I hang out here for very long, I'll become a freekin Genius.... Like you !!! HE-HE

Now that would be Miraculous

Dolorosa wrote:

jkc8560 wrote: Aristostomias wrote: jkc8560 wrote: This is my own postulation, that everything, everywhere is comprised of only one and the same minute particle. This particle is simply moving about throughout the universe without regard to time. Please comment as to your thoughts on this, possible? absurd? Elementary particles, according to current theory (not string theory), are minute by definition: they don't even have volume... And what do you mean movement without regard to time? There is no movement without time. Frankly, your 'theory' lacks of few things: it doesn't explain why we observe multiple particles with different properties (spin, position, momentum, mass, baryon number, lepton number, etc.) that interact in various ways and move along the geodesics of the curved spacetime. These are some elementary questions that should be answered before your model can even be considered. I love this place... If I hang out here for very long, I'll become a freekin Genius.... Like you !!! HE-HE Now that would be Miraculous

HE-HE I still love this place!

As do most of us here