Thank you for the visit ^^

Which of his work you like the most?)
I love digital fortress and angels and demons.

1. Seems like physics rules are the most resistant things to change after the main rule of 'change', we couldn't find scientifically any clue for anything completely static, I'm not sure about what causes this flow, time or anything else.

2. They comes from 'what is good or evil' argue. I mean notions of loss and benefit are our own products, and a look from our point of view. They disappear in time by decomposing into numerous effects and things, so we can't detect all of them to see if they are good or evil, beneficial or losable. That was the point.

3. Sure, we can't know exactly, but we can confine ourselves with strong explanations and predictions. Because, we are not in the expiry of time, we can't even know if there is an end for this. So, change looks like endless for now.

:)

you're welcome :)
what are those new questions? i'm curious about it.

there is no permanent benefit or loss, it depends on the time and the subjec, and it's relative, because change is the only law for billions of years, everything has to change...

Which pop singer?)
Any interest in dan brown?

Cześć jestem Ola, mogę Ci pomóc w nauce angielskiego jeśli chcesz ;)

Thank you for your comment :D

Hey)